3dcalc -a all_runs.FT+orig -b effectsNoInterest+orig -expr 'a-b' -prefix cleanData+orig

This will create a time series with all the drift correction and motion parameter schmutz subtracted out and cast into the pit. What is left over will be signal untainted by motion or drift effects, which we can then use to generate a seed time series.

Before that, however, there is the additional step of warping our data to a template space (such as MNI or Talairach). Assuming you have already warped your anatomical dataset to a template space either manually or using @auto_tlrc, and assuming that there is already good alignment between your anatomical and functional data, you can use the command adwarp:

adwarp -apar anat_final.FT+tlrc -dpar cleanData+orig -dxyz 3 -prefix EPI_subj_01

(Note: There are better ways to do warping, such as the warping option built into align_epi_anat.py (which calls upon @auto_tlrc), but for pedagogical purposes we will stick with adwarp.)

Once this is done, all we need to do is select a seed region for our functional connectivity analysis. This could be a single voxel, a region of interest that averages over an entire area of voxels, or a region selected based on a contrast or an anatomical landmark; it depends on your research question, or whether you want to mess around and do some exploratory analyses. For now, we will use a single voxel using XYZ coordinates centered on the left motor cortex (note that, in this coordinate system, left is positive and posterior is positive):

3dmaskdump -noijk -dbox 20 19 53 EPI_subj_01+tlrc > ideal_ts.1D

Because 3dmaskdump outputs a single row, we will need to transpose this into a column:

1dtranspose ideal_ts.1D LeftMotorIdeal.1D

After you have output your ideal timeseries, open up the AFNI viewer and make sure that what was output matches up with the actual timeseries. In this example, set EPI_subj_01+tlrc as an underlay and right click in the slices viewer to jump to XYZ coordinates of 20, 19, 53; open up the timeseries graph as well, and scroll to the first time point. Does the value there match up with the first entry of your ideal time file? If not, you may have mis-specified the voxel you wanted, or you are using a different XYZ grid than is displayed in the upper left corner of the AFNI viewer. If you run into this situation, consult your local AFNI guru; if you don't have one of those, well...

In any case, we now have all the ingredients for the functional connectivity analysis, and we're ready to pull the trigger. Assemble your materials using 3dfim+ (which, as far as I can understand, stands for "functional intensity map," or something like that):

3dfim+ -polort 3 -input EPI_subj_01+tlrc -ideal_file LeftMotorIdeal.1D -out Correlation -bucket Corr_subj01

You will now have a dataset, Corr_subj_01+tlrc, which is a functional connectivity map between your seed region and the rest of the brain. Note that the threshold slider will now be in R values, instead of beta coefficients or t-statistics; therefore, make sure the order of magnitude button (next to the '**' below the slider) is 0, to restrict the range between +1 and -1.

The last step is to convert these correlation values into z-scores, to reduce skewness and make the distribution more normal. This is done through Fisher's R-to-Z transformation, given by the formula z = (1/2) * ln((1+r)/(1-r)). Using 3dcalc, we can apply this transformation:

3dcalc -a Corr_subj01+tlrc -expr 'log((1+a)/(1-a))/2' -prefix Corr_subj01_Z+tlrc

Those Z-maps can then be entered into a second-level design just like any other, using 3dttest+ or some other variation.

Sanity check: When viewing the correlation maps, jump to your seed region and observe the r-value. It should be 1, which makes sense given that this was the region we were correlating with every other part of the brain, and correlating it with itself should be perfect.

Like me.

Hey Andy,

ReplyDeleteI have a quick question, and I'm sorry if it's incredibly noobish! I've been using your tutorials for some data [mining], but I'm a little confused on the -dxyz command in adwarp. I havent been using it (which is why I suspect my warped data is ~5GB), but I'm a little confused as to why it should be used? I understand it sets the grid-spacing, but I'm unsure as to why it should be 3 when warping to talaraich and not - say - the default of 1x1x1.

Sorry for my ignorance and thank you!

Hi Anonymous,

DeleteThat question is not noobish at all; it is only a real noob who doesn't think he is a noob.

The whole concept of resampling is pretty complicated (which is another way of saying I don't completely understand it), but basically it resizes the voxels to whatever is specified in the -dxyz option. There is nothing special about 3x3x3 voxels, but it tends to be a good tradeoff between spatial resolution, file size, and the amount of signal you have in each voxel. Conceptually it is the same as acquiring different sized voxels directly from the scanner, but applying interpolation after the functional data has already been gathered.

So, you can resample to a size of 1x1x1, or 2x2x2, or 3x3x3, or even make it larger than the original voxel size that was collected; it's up to you for how you want to visualize the data and how much you want to interpolate the signal in each of the voxels. Higher resolution (i.e., smaller voxel size) typically looks nicer in the final analysis, but also takes up more space and introduces more interpolation per voxel.

Hope this helps,

-Andy

Hi Andy,

ReplyDeleteThank you so much for your helpful videos! One question - I ran through all the steps you outlined for a functional analysis, and the correlation maps looked good for each subject (similar values, similar regions). When I submitted the transformed z values to a one-sample t-test (3dtttest++) I had crazy high t-values (if I normally threshold around p = .001 or .0001, I had to get down to 1 x 10^-13 to have anything meaningful). Is this similar to what you have encountered? How does one pick a meaningful threshold in this case? Thanks so much!

Hello,

DeleteThat sounds odd; do the transformed r-to-z maps look normal too? That is, are you seeing similar variability as with your correlation maps? If that all looks OK, it's probably an issue with 3dttest - although I have looked at your post on the AFNI message boards, and that looks fine to me.

In any case, take a look at the z-maps, and let me know if Gang has any insights for you.

-Andy

Thanks for getting back to me (and sorry about the double-posting..AFNI message boards were down and I rapid-posted in desperation). When I do a side-by-side of my r and z maps they look the same and the values are appropriate (so the seed voxel with an r of 1 has a z of 0, a voxel with an r of .63 has a z of .74). I also can't imagine the issue is with 3dttest.

DeleteGang's suggestion was to do PPI instead...which is a little more sophisticated than I need for the point I am trying to make..but I'll give that a shot and see how it goes.

Hi Andy,

ReplyDeleteI did my analysis with different t-test and multiple regression, but i am trying to obtain bar graphs and time series graph.

Do you have any video or part where you explain how to obtain bar graphs showing magnitude of betas and also a time series graph

Please furthermore if it is possible to create those timeseries graph and bar graphs using SPM

ReplyDelete